Swing States - List and Definition

Swing states are those in which neither major political party holds a lock on the outcome of presidential elections. The term can also be used to describe a state whose electoral votes have a high probability of being the deciding factor in a presidential election. Swing states are also sometimes referred to as battleground states. More than a dozen states are considered swing states, and most of them hold a large number of electoral votes and are considered major prizes in presidential elections. Presidential campaigns focus on these states since the election is decided by electoral votes chosen by the popular vote of each state and not by a direct national popular vote. Safe states, on the other hand, are those where a majority of voters are expected to vote either for the Democratic or Republican candidate, so those electoral votes are considered to be safely on the candidate of that partys tally. List of Swing States The states most often described as being up in the air or ones that could side with either a Republican or Democratic presidential candidate are: Arizona:  11 electoral votes. The state voted for the Republican presidential nominee in 10 of the last 11 elections.Colorado: Nine  electoral votes.  The state voted for the Republican presidential nominee in seven of the last 11 elections.Florida: 29  electoral votes.  The state voted for the Republican presidential nominee in seven of the last 11 elections.Georgia: 16  electoral votes.  The state voted for the Republican presidential nominee in eight  of the last 11 elections.Iowa: Six  electoral votes.  The state voted for the Democratic presidential nominee in six of the last 11 elections.Michigan: 16  electoral votes.  The state voted for the Democratic presidential nominee in six  of the last 11 elections.  Minnesota: 10 electoral votes.  Ã‚  The state voted for the Democratic presidential nominee in each of the last 11 elections.Nevada: Six  electoral votes.  The state voted for the Republican presidential nominee in six of the last 11 electi ons.New Hampshire:  Four electoral votes. The state voted for the Democratic presidential nominee in six of the last 11 elections.North Carolina: 15  electoral votes.  The state voted for the Republican presidential nominee in nine of the last 10 elections.Ohio: 18 electoral votes.  The state voted for the Republican presidential nominee in six of the last 11 elections.Pennsylvania: 20  electoral votes.  The state voted for the Democratic presidential nominee in seven of the last 11 elections.  Virginia: 13 electoral votes.  The state voted for the Republican presidential nominee in eight of the last 11 elections.Wisconsin: 10  electoral votes.  The state voted for the Democratic presidential nominee in eight of the last 11 elections.   Texas is mentioned as a possible swing state in the 2020 presidential election. It voted for the Republican nominee in 10 of the last 11 elections, with Jimmy Carter in 1976 being the last Democrat to win the state. Swing Voters and Their Role States that shift back and forth between candidates of both major political parties in presidential elections could be evenly divided between voters registered Republican and Democratic. Or they could have large numbers of swing voters, those who tend to vote for individual candidates and not the party and have no loyalty to a party. The portion of the American electorate made up of swing voters ranges from about a quarter to a third between presidential elections, according to the Pew Research Center. The number of swing voters declines when an incumbent president is seeking a second term. Different Uses of Swing State The term swing state is used in two different ways. The most popular use of swing state is to describe one in which the popular vote margin in a presidential race is relatively narrow and fluid, meaning that either a Republican or Democrat could win the states electoral votes in any given election cycle. Others define swing states as those that could be the tipping point in a presidential election. For example, Nate Silver, a widely read political journalist writing on The New York Times blog FiveThirtyEight, defined the term swing state this way: When I employ the term, I mean a state that could swing the outcome of the election. That is, if the state changed hands, the victor in the Electoral College would change as well.

Business Premises Of The Company - 1335 Words

Business Premises Calypso Pty Ltd – a manufacturing and distributing company based in Perth Western Australia- has created a new energy drink titled ‘Alive’. The company has outsourced the production of the product to the Coca-Cola Amatil (CCA) in the Coca-Cola Bottlers at 19 Miles Rd, Kewdale Perth Western Australia 6105 (one of the largest bottlers of non-alcoholic ready-to-drink beverages). The business has decided to outsource as it will save Calypso Pty Ltd thousands of dollars, money will be saved on the purchase of machinery, on the training of staff to work, control and monitor the machinery whilst gaining the swiftness and expertise of the Coca-Cola Bottlers employees and on the purchase of a premises/ factory in order to†¦show more content†¦In regards to insurance Calypso Pty Ltd is associated with the Coca-Cola Amatil and therefore their leading property insurer, Vero and each year and provides its clients with detailed risk reports. In the most recent case of the Kewdale plant Coca-Cola Bottlers, Vero provided between 15-20 risk recommendations, which CCA went to great lengths to address as swiftly as possible. Production Process The manufacturing of the ‘Alive’ energy drinks begins with clarifying the water as the quality of water is crucial to the success of an energy drink because impurities, such as suspended particles, organic matter, and bacteria, may ruin the taste and color; this is done through the traditional process of a series of coagulation, filtration, and chlorination. Meanwhile the sugar

The Case of the Lightning Strike Free Essays

In forwarded e-mails across the country are many stories of frivolous lawsuits with huge payouts.   First, there is the story of Kathleen Roberson who won $780,000 after breaking her ankle tripping over her own son in a furniture store.   Carl Truman of Los Angeles won $74,000 when a neighbor reversed over his hand with a Honda Accord. We will write a custom essay sample on The Case of the Lightning Strike or any similar topic only for you Order Now    The court knew that he had sustained this injury in his attempt to steal the hubcaps, yet ruled in his favor anyway.   The case that I am about to present to you is almost as silly as the first two, but the tone of the article is perfectly serious one in a national publication (Reader’s Digest). Van Maussner and three of his friends went golfing at a country club in Atlantic City.   The skies were dark with rain clouds, but the sports enthusiasts would not allow it to put a damper on their time.   After they reached the 12th hole, Maussner was struck by lightning and nearly died of his injuries.   Later, he sued the course for negligence, as they did not have the â€Å"proper safety procedures in place to protect patrons from lighting†(Gerber, 152). He lost at the lower court, but won at the Superior Court who ruled, â€Å"injuries through acts of God don’t exempt courses from liability†(Gerber, 153).   Is it any wonder why frivolous lawsuits flourish when companies are liable for events beyond their control?   Whatever happened to checking the weather report before going out and a little thing called personal responsibility? This paper will examine the case of the plaintiff and isolate the flaws in his argument. First, the article mentions that the men â€Å"prided themselves on hitting the links throughout the year, regardless of the weather†(p. 151).  Ã‚  Ã‚   This point is relevant because it would imply that it did not matter what the weather channel or club personnel warned—they would have gone about their business regardless.   In fact, the club checked the reports before allowing them on the course in the first place since there was no mention of lightning in the forecast. In a similar case (Ned P. Harris v. United States of America) the plaintiff was going rock climbing when he was struck by lightning.   When it came to court, the judge dismissed the case because, â€Å"He saw no power in the plaintiff’s argument that the National Park Service was to blame for his current situation†(Percelay, 68). The second argument the plaintiff made was that there was no system in place to protect players from inclement weather.   In fact, the club had an evacuation process for more than 40 years: at the first sign of bad weather, employees would cart around the golf course and warn players off.   In fact, two caddies tried to get the group to seek shelter, â€Å"but the men decided against it†(Gerber, 152). Third, it was further argued that â€Å"the country club did not have signs posted about its evacuation plan, nor did it begin telling players to seek shelter at neighboring houses until after his accident.   If the club had proper precautions in place, he would not have suffered the injuries†(Gerber, 153).   Under U.S. Law, if a corporation has an evacuation procedure in place but does not utilize it correctly, it may be held liable. Under scrutiny was â€Å"whether the club [promoted safety] in the way it posted evacuation notices and monitored dangerous conditions, and if it should have built shelters and provided and audible signal†(Gerber, 153).   Would such a system truly prevent lighting strikes in the future?   History has shown a large number of people knowingly venture out in spite of unfavorable weather conditions, i.e. storm trackers, scientists, the curious, and the careless.   Anyone that exposes themselves willingly to extreme weather takes his own life in his hands. In sum, the article tried to achieve balance by including both sides of the story.   However, in creating sympathy for Maussner by implying the negligence of the country club, Gerber tacitly encourages the abdication of personal responsibility for universal liability if it includes the possibility of safety for everyone.   Also, frivolous lawsuits give rise to more frivolous lawsuits. Five years ago, (9 years after Maussner’s case was settled) obese teenagers sued McDonald’s for making them fat. â€Å"McDonald’s is responsible for their obesity because it did not provide the necessary information about the health risks associated with its meals†(Santora).   This was the first case of its kind heard in court.   In order for society to get back on track, people need to assume responsibility for their own choices and accept the consequences, whatever they may be. Works Cited Gerber, Robin. â€Å"You Be the Judge: When lightning strikes a golfer, is the country club at fault?† Reader’s Digest. August 2007, pp. 151-153 Percelay, James. Whiplash!: America’s Most Frivolous Lawsuits. Riverside, NJ: Andrews McMeel Publishing Santora, Marc. â€Å"Teenagers’ Suit Says McDonald’s Made Them Obese.† The New York Times. 21 Nov. 2002 Accessed 20 Aug. 2007 at http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?sec=health;res=9A0DE7DC1439F932A15752C1A9649C8B63 ; How to cite The Case of the Lightning Strike, Essay examples